Tuesday, January 17, 2023
Saturday, January 14, 2023
Stone Structures in Shutesbury (MA)
Stone wall dissent continues...
(Mostly dissenting inside the parentheses, along with an occasional cross out.)
“The town of
Shutesbury is without a doubt full of human-created stone structures. Stone walls border many roads…
The Town's land area was dissected by well-used Indigenous paths (that should be known as Indigenous roads and Indigenous highways)
running east and west, as noted above (see Appendix E “Turners Falls Sacred Ceremonial Hill
Determination of Eligibility”). Some existing roads are built atop these paths (that should be known as Indigenous roads and Indigenous highways).
Roadside stone walls,
(assumed to be) built along the (Colonial) roads that replaced these paths (that
should be known as Indigenous roads and
Indigenous highways), are probably the most visible evidence of
Shutesbury’s stonework (and need to be carefully observed to detect Indigenous
Iconography – and perhaps tested to determine the age of the roadside “walls”).
Stone walls are ubiquitous across New
England. Robert Thorson, a geologist at the University of Connecticut, is a
leading expert (best-selling
author) on (the popular myths about) New England stone walls. He (repeats) estimates that
there are more than 240,000 miles of stone walls in New England (according to an 1871 survey), amounting to
40 million “man-days” of labor. 61 (The pdf article claims the geologist claims) Colonial stone wall building occurred primarily during the early Federal Period (1775-1825), (which is 100 years after the Colonial Period and to his credit he does mention the use of wooden fencing during the Colonial Period).
Based on a
detailed review of the written record of colonial agriculture in New England, (Young
James) Gage (2013, p. 27) notes that field clearing occurred primarily in
plowed fields: livestock pastures and orchards, such as are found in
Shutesbury, were rarely cleared. Footnote 62
In the first comprehensive study of stonework
in New England, researchers Mavor and Dix (Manitou
1989, p. 84) note that many stone walls in New England have celestial
alignments, occur far from Euro American homesteads, and do not appear to serve
as boundary markers (which is not true where I live). 63
Many stone features in New England show human handiwork, including
petroglyphs, carving/chipping, and splitting. Some include the inexplicable
placement of huge boulders atop a bed of smaller stones or the equally
mysterious placement of piles of small stones atop boulders.
Mavor and Dix report:
“Rather than use the
functionally limiting terms fence and
wall, we prefer to call the linear
stone structures by the name of stone row. We are then not confined to a
utilitarian image but can visualize them as landscape architecture following
land contours, connecting tops of hills with valleys and ponds, connecting
large boulders and rock outcrops, defining the shapes of the wetlands and
highlighting distant horizons.” (pp. 84-85)
Stone structure
researchers Gage and Gage (2016) have also conducted extensive research on New
England stonework and note that many stone structures and rows appear in areas
not subject to settler activities. They demonstrate that many stone structures,
presumably Indigenous in origin, can be found on various terrains within many
surviving on former woodlots. 64
This discussion
suggests we should not assume that all stone
“walls” and other structures in our community are the product of settler
activities. As Mavor and Dix (1989, p. 304) point out, “The ancient tradition
of large-scale stone construction among Algonquian-speakers, the historic
accounts of this native stone construction, the nature and quantity of
stonework on the New England landscape, and the deliberately low social
visibility of Indians since the time of the Second Puritan War lend support to
the hypothesis that Native Americans constructed the majority of New England’s
stone rows and other stone structures.” 65
Pages 24 & 25
"During the 19th and 20th centuries, European-American archaeologists failed to understand these structures and created a picture of pre-colonial Indigenous society as being too decentralized and nomadic to create large construction projects. This narrative was compounded by the conclusion, unsupported by any scientific methodology, that all stone structures in New England were the result of early Euro-American field clearing. Hoffman (2018) notes that the traditional “it’s just stones from field clearing” theory has become more implausible and unsustainable with the accumulating empirical evidence that Indigenous CSLs are widespread across the Northeast.
Stone structures of possible Indigenous origin throughout
New England have been documented by field researchers. Footnotes 78 79
78 http://ceremonial-stone-landscapes.com/index.php/ - no longer works
&
can be found in part here:
https://neara.org/gallery/LarryHarrop/
79 http://wakinguponturtleisland.blogspot.com/
The original Document:
That Survey as a Poem
https://wakinguponturtleisland.blogspot.com/2019/12/ct-statistics-of-fences-in-united.html
Thursday, January 12, 2023
“One Snake at a Time”
They all say:
A “Good” Yankee stone wall is/was laid down “one over two”
and “two over one,” "one block of stone at a time.”
I’ll say:
"Sometimes it seems as if the Indigenous stonework
which is often misidentified as a "Yankee Farmer stone wall"
is/was laid down “One snake at a time,”
a stone head followed by body and tail, one stone at a
time."
I'll say:
Indigenous “Stone Walls” sometimes look right at you as you enter an enclosure, have other effigies incorporated into the bodies composed of smaller snake effigies, and can often sometimes still be found snaking across the landscape, another variation yet to be found…
Wednesday, January 04, 2023
Obvious Things
“The Massachusetts landscape is full of obvious Indigenous created Stone Great Snake Beings which almost
nobody by any chance ever observes.” –Sherlock Stones *
The fog was thick,
the ground muddy, and Sherlock Stones was indoors in his computer chair that morning, clicking through old photos from a
digital archive from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. It was early on in the
New Year, as well as early on in the day, when Dr. John Possum looked in on his
Ceremonial Stone Landscape research partner.
“Possum,” Sherlock
Stones said without moving his eyes from the large computer screen, “The
Massachusetts landscape one finds recorded in these old images is full of
obvious Indigenous created Stone Great Snake Beings which almost nobody by any
chance ever observes.”
“Is that so?” Possum
replied. “You’ll have to show me just what you mean, knowing the present stance
of total denial the MA Historic Commission takes when it comes to the Indigenous
CSL issue.”
Sherlock Stones pulled
up one of the digital images and said, “Here’s a good example right here:”
Fields image
Dr. Possum looked a
moment, then removed his reading glasses and began polishing the lenses. “My
dear Sherlock,” he said, “I’m not quite sure what you mean with this one. This
looks typical of almost any “stone wall” in the region, hardly anything that
stands out as “remarkable” in any sense.” Possum put his spectacles back on and
peered at the big screen again.
“You see, but you do not observe,” Stones
remarked. “But you are not alone. And besides I have hope for you yet. Take
note of the size of the image and then the enlargement feature. You’ll note a little
“Whoops” in the otherwise fairly uniform level height of this particular
Suspect Row of Stones.”
“Suspect Row of
Stones?” Possum repeated his associate’s phrase, capital letters and all.
“Every so-called “stone
wall” or assumed “stone fence” should be suspect when it comes to proper identification,” Stones replied. “This whole “Farmer Wall vs Indian Wall” is
rife with problems, all the misinformation that often goes unchallenged when it
comes to – ah here you go, Possum!”
The enlargement
finally loaded (Sherlock Stones uses an older laptop, its power cord duct
taped into place, which uses an operating system that was considered “quaint” about
20 years ago):
“One begins to detect the presence of effigies in the stonework, “eyes” on certain boulders of a certain rattlesnake snake head shape, a “singing stone” with an open mouth, and several possible, or probable, turtles that one associates with Indigenous Iconography or “art” found in other media.”
“Perhaps, Sherlock,
perhaps,” Possum concurred, “But really nothing that strikes me as obvious and
unmistakable - nothing "jumps out at me," as they say.”
With another mouse
click, a different image appeared on the screen, a winter scene that included a
section of “stone wall” and a farm building of some sort.
“This one should be obvious to you,” Stones was saying as he sat back in his battered computer chair. “You will recall the Curious Case of the Preacher's Gateway, where one can observe a pair of Stone Serpents guarding the entrance to an enclosure, one of them with an obvious white eye which needed no overlay to add as it was already apparent on the chosen and placed stone “head stone.”
"The only thing more deceptive than one obvious snake effigy is two obvious snake effigies, eh?" Possum replied.
"While one effigy is possibly nothing, two similar such effigies may be a coincidence, but add a third, such as this one, and we seem to have an Obvious Snake Effigy Conspiracy before our collective eyes, Possum" Sherlock Stones stated. "Observe: Head turned to the side, Uktena-like, followed by a sinuous serpentine twisty body stretching out behind..."
Sherlock caught the sideways glance of the good doctor, a retired Rocket Surgeon. “Cease to merely see and allow yourself to observe, my dear Possum; there also seems to be an indication of an eye on that prominent boulder where the row of stones – or Snake Effigy – begins.”
“Well, I can’t argue that,” Possum remarked. “I’d have to repeat something like “Indians around here didn’t do that” or something to that effect, a phrase I don’t find all that reliable.” He paused and then added, “Seems remarkable that no one ever noticed this before.”
“Consider the times
and the fencing of the day when this became private property, a farm, in the
area.” Stones began clicking away at images and imported them into a single
image in an old (free) program most people would be embarrassed to be using. ”Wooden
fences were the fence of choice in those days, easily constructed of an
abundant material at that early date, an instrument of the early laws of
property acquisition and “improvement” to the landscape the Puritans were trying to portray as Vacant Wilderness.
The Indian made Effigy is not only discounted as a possible fence or enclosure
but also “covered up as Indigenous,” so to speak, with the fencing required by the colony’s
law.”
“Indeed,” remarked
Sherlock Stones, “Our Hidden Landscapes," ** hidden figuratively, literally, and even legally.”
*“The world is full of obvious things which nobody by any chance ever observes.” - Sherlock Holmes (Arthur Conan Doyle)
Friday, December 23, 2022
Waking Up for a Moment after the Winter Solstice...
Perhaps the Great Snake that protects our house was not quite fully asleep yet, the warm wind and rain melting the snow, perhaps opening up the Spirit Being’s eyes…
The wind took down most of the hemlock closest to the house,
at the corner where I had started to restore it…
Laugh at my superstitious belief if you like, don’t believe me that
it is really Indigenous Stonework if you choose, but I know all that tobacco burned on clam
shells, on capstones that I didn’t even realize were Big Snakes for years and years, kept
and keep me on the good side of the Guardian Serpent…
Thursday, December 22, 2022
Single Horn Serpent Being From Jerry Zani (RI)
Sunday, December 11, 2022
Another Day, Another Serpent Surprise (Nonnewaug CT)
Another day, different light as well as weather conditions,
I thought I'd catch another glimpse of a 'new" serpent I saw yesterday for
the first time in these stones...
Friday, December 09, 2022
Driveway Surprise Serpent (Nonnewaug CT)
Deer antlered snakes serpents
Such horned serpents are known as a-bich-kam (Algonquin) and
che-pich-kaam (Micmac)
(Figure 10). Antecedents can be traced back to artifacts of
the Mississippian mound-builder cultures (Lankford 2007), dating to a.d. 1200 –
1450, which depict various forms of horned serpents (Figure 9g), known in the
Mississippian literature as “ Horned Water Serpents ” (Lankford 2007:110 –
119). Such horned serpents are known as a-bich-kam (Algonquin) and
che-pich-kaam (Micmac) and among the Fox Indians it is known to cause illness
and swelling of the limbs or jaw (Lankford 2007: 119 – 120)...North American
horned serpents were associated with a watery underworld, winds, rain,
diseases, and their cures, suggesting that the association between these
supernatural creatures and illness and curing was widespread...
…In consequence,
these instances suggest either a widespread diffusion from Mesoamerica, or that
horned serpents are reflections of an ancient and deep-seated stratum of Amerindian
mythologies. Within Mesoamerica the melding of deer and snake are known from a
series of languages where they appear as a compound of the words ‘ deer ’ and ‘
snake, ’ designating large snakes, especially boas ( Boa constrictor ) (Figure
10). The repeated occurrence of the ‘deer-snake ’ compound in a variety of
Native American languages has been treated as a type of linguistic loan known
as a calque, which is to say as a literal translation, rather than the adaption
of a loanword directly from the donor culture (Campbell et al. 1986:553, 554;
Smith-Stark 1994:20, 36). In linguistics it is stipulated that the grouping of
terms and the concept behind particular calques originally stem from the
language of one specific culture group and by means of literal translations are
adopted into other languages as loan-concepts, implying that the particular
social context of the exchange is a bilingual one. The most exhaustive study of
the distribution of such calques in Mesoamerica (Smith-Stark 1994) found that ‘deer-serpents
’ are clearly represented in several languages (and language families), either
as calques or as loanwords (Table 1)…”
‘Distribution of
North American and Mesoamerican languages that exhibit the calque ‘ deer-snake
’ in their vocabulary and mythology. Archaeological cultures (Classic Maya,
Mogollon, Anasazi and Mississippian Moundbuilders) are rendered in diagonal
hatching. Findspots of the deer-snakes and horned serpents represented in
Figure 9 are rendered alphabetically. Scale is variable in this UTM projection
and the scale bar is computed in relation to the centre of the map.’
Based on maps in
Golla et al. (2007) and Kaufman (1994). Map drawn by Christophe Helmke.
Thursday, December 01, 2022
A Dam Serpent Surprise (Watertown CT)
Another Sort of "Water Wall"
I took a little walk. I even stayed on the path until the hill turned steep, until the sound of the river called me to it – well, after I wandered off a little to look at the zigzag rows of stones still partially visible under the messy piles of stones dumped on them. I ended up by some of the last remaining rows of stones on that I’m pretty convinced are retaining walls for an Indigenous foot path – a causeway if you will.
A “Colonial
Construction related to the Cleveland Grist Mill” another person might
conclude, but the Indigenous Iconography and other observations as well as location make me think
otherwise. There is no reason I can think of any sort of practical purpose I
can think of to build something like this a half mile downstream from the actual
mill and dam. This is an early mill, for grinding grain, from sometime around
1700. For some time now, I suspect the dam to contain Indigenous Iconography
very similar to the Indigenous stonework at my family home of the last forty
years. Right in front of the house for example, the top course of stone closely
resembles a European capstone, the stones were dressed so as to resemble big
snakes.
Refreshing my
memory about the mill itself, I perused some photos collected by Watertown CT Historian
Charlie Crowell and shamelessly lifted several photos. I was totally surprised
to find this one:
I took about my
tenth look at this “new to me” photo and then made a crop of the now missing
stonework to look for “snakes and turtles” in the stonework. Sometimes it seems
to take that one effigy to come into focus before you just can’t stop seeing
the others.
Well now, so it
would seem, the capstone on the top of the dam, over which the water flowed,
very much resembled the capstone snakes here at home…




































