Friday, February 28, 2020

An Emerging Serpent (RI)



    "The explanation of Moore and Weiss' Figure 3 (2016:51), which shows a ring of carefully stacked cobbles outlining part of a boulder and trailing behind it, forming an emerging serpent form, reports a claim by Ives that it "allows for a large quantity of stones to be stored within a small footprint."  Objectively assessed, the form claimed by Ives to be an efficiency device is not at all efficient; it holds very few stones for its area on actual count. Ives' cited conjecture fails upon real-life testing and practical farm economics, and fails to explain the "stone corral" shown, being built partly on and partly off an immovable boulder, and being empty of actual "stored stones." No explanation is offered as to why stone "corrals" are usually empty at sites across the Northeast, or why stones on immovable boulders, which do not move on their own, need to be "corralled." 

     Evaluations of máunumúetash*  by parties who do not test their hypotheses against Northeast Algonquian cosmology and rituals are doing, at best, only half an investigation..."

Rolf Cachat
Bulletin of Society for Connecticut Archaeology (2018)


*Máunumúet(ash) - place(s) of ceremonial gathering (ehenda mawewink, Lënapeuw, mawighunk, Mahhekanneuw). Themes of connectedness, reciprocity, prayerfulness and continuity are expressed through máunumúetash.

Monday, February 24, 2020

Ives' Eyes

    A "Redneck Archaeologist's" observations of an Indigenous pattern of placing stones in a "wall" in such a way as to suggest the row of stones that is possibly a larger stone  Snake Effigy is made up of smaller stone effigies, often smaller snakes, sometimes effigies of other sorts - and perhaps most often and most easily recognizable of Turtles (even in a YouTube video):
A brief glimpse:
A moment of recognition, observing a shell and a head stone:

Suggestion of a Specific Species:

The light catches some other effigies:

Making the effigies come alive by overlaying human eyes:



  “Ives remains skeptical of ceremonial stone landscape theory, noting that it was independently developed by Euro-American antiquarians prior to its endorsement by Native American tribal authorities, and has expressed concern regarding the broader social costs of ceremonial stone landscape preservation campaigns, citing their record of mobilizing white guilt, the psychosocial phenomenon described by race relations scholar Shelby Steele, to gain political support and subvert criticism…”
   Some Images from: Ives, Timothy H., "Stone Heaping Practices of Nineteenth-Century Farmers: New Insights from Archival Sources", An invited presentation for the Annual Meeting of the Barrington Preservation Society, January 26, 2020.  https://youtu.be/uGWoMRPRxDI

Search results for that third distinguishing characteristic of a nuchal notch that even a Professional Archaeologist can be trained to identify:
https://wakinguponturtleisland.blogspot.com/search?q=nuchal

Friday, February 21, 2020

Further On Up the Road

At the Preacher's Preserve
(2016)
   Above: A segment of stonework, an assumed "stone fence" or an "Estate Wall" associated with the first Puritan Minister in the former "North Woodbury Purchase," in the Nonnewaug Cluster, CT Cluster #3 in Stone Prayers by Curtiss Hoffman (2018). It's "further on up the road" from an interesting gateway that has one of the finest examples of a row of stones that may be a Snake Effigy:
Overlaying a snake's eye isn't necessary to emphasize the observation:
Adding eyes and horns makes it come alive, so to speak:

Collection of other similar observations of the repeated pattern here:

Back to that photo from 2016, I observed that this gently undulating row of stones could be said to have been stacked in courses that could be said to resemble smaller stone snakes -rather than stones randomly stacked during field clearing or removal from the road I was walking along or a "formal wall" made using batter boards or strings typical of English stone fence constructions that are more brick or block-like:
What I did not notice until just yesterday was that there may be another snake effigy segment  of this row of stones which was in the shadows that day and is just out of the photo:


Collection of Serpent Stacking photos and overlays:

Thursday, February 20, 2020

Anthropomorphic Effigy faces (Maryland)


Sherry R. writes, “I read your blog about the little face found in Lisbon (CT): 

I have a collection of artifacts found from 1900-1930 off a farm in Maryland including little faces. The faces look like individuals and are small and flat… I believe they are clay, but not sure..."

   "All we know is they were found by the owner of a farm. Coastal farmland. Items were glued to this board between 1920-30 by the land owner. They are still attached so I don't know what's on the backs. The display board is ugly so I wanted to detach them. I was considering detaching them until I saw the story about a similar face that was said to be rare. This board was one that the farmer's Grandson did not want because he said he was keeping the best ones. I'll attach some side views of the faces…"





"This is a piece of pottery shard on the board and stone beads:"





Tuesday, February 18, 2020

Are Their (sic) Pre-Colonial Stone Ruins? (Madison CT)

Posted on April 3, 2015 by Robert Thorson
          (with some editing/annotation of mine in quotes)
   "Of course there are!  There have to be!  Hundreds of thousands of human beings have walked and worked the New England uplands for at least 11,000 years.  And many features have been confirmed as pre-Colonial by properly credentialed archaeologists.
But let us not conflate the few (thousand miles of), the small, (the large) and the odd(ly unnoticed and incredibly beautiful) stone (Snake Effigies and other remarkable) features in the woods (and next to the occasional Stop & Shop) with the latticework of (culturally appropriated and then) abandoned stone walls gracing much of the New England countryside. This latticework of walls is (assumed to be) the collective work of colonial and early American farmsteads built by Euro-settlers and their descendants since 1607 (or so contends a geologist who is not trained to recognize Indigenous Sacred Ceremonial Stone Landscapes)..." https://stonewall.uconn.edu/2015/04/03/are-their-pre-colonial-stone-ruins/

Here's a reliable source about Indigenous Ceremonial Stone Landscapes:

Samson/Sampson Rock in September 2019:


"Those who know say the Uktena is a great snake, as large around as a tree trunk, with horns on its head, and a bright blazing crest like a diamond on its forehead, and scales glowing like sparks of fire. It has rings or spots of color along its whole length, and can not be wounded except by shooting in the seventh spot from the head, because under this spot are its heart and its life. The blazing diamond is called Ulun'suti—"Transparent"—and he who can win it may become the greatest wonder worker of the tribe. But it is worth a man's life to attempt it, for whoever is seen by the Uktena is so dazed by the bright light that he runs toward the snake instead of trying to escape. As if this were not enough, the breath of the Uktena is so pestilential, that no living creature can survive should they inhale the tiniest bit of the foul air expelled by the Uktena. Even to see the Uktena asleep is death, not to the hunter himself, but to his family." - James Mooney Myths of the Cherokee

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horned_Serpent


See also:

Thorson in "Their" also writes: "Last night, while giving a talk to the Boxborough Conservation Trust in Massachusetts, I got the inevitable question about pre-colonial stone ruins. This morning, I decided to post my answer in the form of a keynote speech I gave several years ago to the New England Antiquities Research Association."

Follow this link to "Thorson’s Keynote Speech to (sic) NERA:" https://stonewall.uconn.edu/.../thorsons-keynote-speech.../