(or at least try)
Jumping off of the Rock Piles Post Agricultural use versus rock pile site where I left an almost coherent comment (maybe), I attempt to clarify some thoughts below:
I think
that there are some well-known facts that are too often neglected to be taken
into perspective when discussing the still remaining Stone Features on the
Indigenous Cultural Landscape.
The first
to come to my mind, and perhaps the most important, is the Pre-Contact
Indigenous use of fire to produce an abundance of resources. Charles Mann (a map he uses in 1493 above, another below) addresses
the issue in a wide view of the western hemisphere in 1491 and William Cronon
focuses in on New England in Changes in the Land, not as a simple “slash and
burn,” but as a more involved and sophisticated practice, both calling the
Indigenous People the keystone species responsible for the creation of a mosaic
of resource zones that were wonders to the earliest of Europeans who saw that
abundance.
Some archaeologists and anthropologists call the introduction of
maize into New England a “non-event” in an already densely populated area with
an already increasing rate sedentism (or semi-sedentism – semi-permanent villages
or base camps that People returned to after traveling to outlying sites to “hunt
and gather” or collect some sort of resource) because of the efficiency of that
sustainable system of manipulating the environment that is poorly described as “hunting
and gathering.” Groups of Indigenous People would have to have had an increasingly
better means of controlling those fires as populations grew, burning over only certain
tracts of land at certain times while leaving others to produce, rather than
some sort of widespread and destructive conflagration that neighboring groups
of People might not appreciate.
Cronan suggests that these things are best
studied in “locale” and wandering around from floodplain to uplands and beyond
in my locale, following zigzag and linear rows of stones along both sides of watercourses
was the first place I realized that one function of these constructions seemed
to be fuel breaks ensuring that the riparian resource zone would be protected
from burning, preserving a green canopy that improves water quality. Another
place these double rows of stones occurred was along some trails – especially true
of trails that became modern roads, some still with remnants of rows of stones
still, many more discernable on CT aerial photos from 1934.
I can’t think of an
easier way to keep a trail clear than to “burn it over" in the fall or the
spring – or both. Intersecting these riparian rows and trail rows are other
rows of stones, some linear, some zigzag some changing from one to the other,
what resource was inside each a puzzle, sometimes with a plant species like
blueberries still remaining and growing as clues as to what might have been. The
Law of Parsimony works well with this Indigenous Fire Hypothesis, Indigenous People
building stone fuel breaks over thousands of years.
Next to come to mind is the Post Contact business of
defining a legal fence in order to claim ownership of land, usually involving
the earliest of New England Fences, easily made wooden rail fences. Every
single stone wall book or magazine (or web post) article I’ve ever come across
drives home the point that earliest of fences were made of wooden rails, the
stones haphazardly tossed up against the rails as fields were cleared and
plowed (or those prime targets of the early days, the already cleared horticultural fields that Indigenous People had recently vacated). Most insist you had to wait for the American Revolutionary War to be
over for a supposed Golden Age of Stonewall Building to begin – and then barely
a hundred years later the fun is all over because someone invents barbed wire.
Some authors insist these New England stone fences, all the estimated quarter
million miles of them, that were too much work for the early European settlers,
suddenly appeared between 1783 and an “established Farm Era” that ended about 1825-1835
when people abandoned farms here for more productive land elsewhere or moved to
the cities (Thorson), defying the Law of Parsimony once again because: "It's easier to leave a stone wall alone that to build one."
I think more attention needs to be paid to the manner of construction of those "stone walls" that are too casually dismissed as "agrarian" - in the post contact sense - especially if those "stone walls" end in (or include) a grinning serpent's head like this one above, - and contain stones that are placed to recall turtles (like the one below, just a little south of that grinning serpent - and in a still active agricultural zone) as well as all those bears and birds and rhomboids and much, much more...
I'm adding this: http://wakinguponturtleisland.blogspot.com/2014/09/two-on-burning-as-in-burnt-hill.html
In which Mann book are those maps found?
ReplyDeleteThe maps come from pages 40 & 41 of "1493," the follow up to "1491." The credit reads:
ReplyDelete"Maps created by Nick Springer and Tracy Pollack, Springer Cartographics LLC: copyright by Charles C. Mann"
Thanks Tim your blog is amazing
ReplyDeleteYou make an excellent and convincing synopsis of the history of the pre Colonial NA culture building the stone walls found everywhere across the NE landscape. Thank you.
ReplyDelete