Timothy H. Ives was kind enough to email me a copy of the “Cairnfields
in New England’s Forgotten Pastures.” I read it once, then twice, and then I
read it once again. Each time I got the feeling that I’d read it somewhere
before but I know that can’t be true. I guess that it is just sounds so much so
much like so many other things I’ve read about "stone mounds" and "stone walls" presented as reminders of an “agrarian past” related to a very brief period of
time (the last 400 years or so).
Dr. Ives abstract states: Most of the
cairnfields in New England’s forested hills were likely built by
nineteenth-century farmers to prolong the usefulness of increasingly stony,
overgrazed pastures. This working hypothesis is supported by a historical
context, observations of cairnfields in Rhode Island, and a formation model
that accounts for important cultural and environmental factors. Cairnfields may
yield new and important insights into some of the more prosaic, historically
overlooked dimensions of agrarian pasts, particularly when their study
leverages a landscape approach within the context of farmstead archaeology.
I’m not sure how, as Ives writes, “this
paper presents a modest contribution toward the shared goal of distinguishing
ceremonial stonework from that of farmers (Lavin 2013:296) in a region where a
variety of mutually influential cultural traditions render stone piles and
cairns meaningful (Ives 2013).” Every figure included in the paper, some of
them obviously Indigenous-made constructions in the eyes of members of the
Narragansett Tribal Nation or independent researchers, is presented as proof,
such as Robert Thorson “imagines” and Susan Allport “proposes,” of how post
contact agrarian field clearing might look, while neglecting to show any image
of any proven/highly probable Indigenous Stone Feature of any kind anywhere as an example.
While Ives wants to “emphasize that no disrespect is intended toward Native
American Tribes who may ascribe sacred value to cairnfields within the context
of Ceremonial Stone Landscapes (sensu United South and Eastern Tribes,
Inc. 2007), he seems reluctant to mention a single Indigenous Cultural
Landscape in the western hemi-sphere for comparison, including the federally recognized Turners
Falls Sacred Ceremonial Hill Site in Massachusetts. Every word written in “Cairnfields” seems to
deny that Indigenous Cultures in the Northeast, over a span of 12,000 years or more, could have
possibly left any visible reminder of their presence on the landscape.
Reading the paper caused me to pause and
ask some myself some “If/Then” questions:
“If the already understudied Indigenous Cultural Landscape is
ignored, particularly in the case of Ceremonial Stone Features, then wouldn’t a person be guilty of passing off Pseudoscience as
Science, substituting myths for truth, and Ethnically Cleansing away evidence
of thousands of years of Traditional Ecological Knowledge by claiming, without
further research, that the great majority of stonework in the Northeast is the
result of field clearing methods of post-contact agriculture?
If there are many free
standing stone concentrations/constructions that either contain effigies or
resemble animals both actual and legendary, as well as other designs and
patterns that figured highly and appear in the artwork in other media created
by the Indigenous People of Turtle Island (Native Americans of North America) –
the turtle, bear and deer etc. along with the Great Serpents etc, - then who was more likely to have the
time and motivation to create this artwork - Indigenous People or farmers
fancifully and whimsically "doodling" as Thorson calls it, "Demented Uncles" stacking stone as a sort of therapy invented by Yankee Farmers?
If those same techniques
and designs found in Indigenous artwork can be found in those longer piles of
stones most often called “stone walls” then
again, who was most likely to have the greater amount of time and greater
motivation to create this artwork especially when the stone wall ends (begins) in what
clearly resembles a snake head (as I once heard a panel member at a Round-table Discussion on Stone Features and Ceremonial Stone Landscapes at the IAIS Research Center
say, as if reading my mind)?
If the Indigenous People
of Turtle Island (Native Americans of North America) maintained the landscape
with fire then how were those fires
controlled, especially in areas of dense population? Which would be a considered the more “dire need” to justify the
labor required to create that estimated "quarter million miles of stone walls" – fuel
breaks to control Indigenous burning over a great length of time or animal
containment fences in the brief period of time known as the Golden Age of
Stonewall Building that began shortly after the American Revolutionary War and ended
with the invention of barbed wire?
If Paleo-Indians (the
Ancestors of the Indigenous People of Turtle Island) made “sophisticated
prehistoric stone walls deep beneath the surface of Lake Huron,” the most
recent find described as “two stone lines forming a lane about 30 metres long
and eight metres wide which ended in a corral-type structure” with “hunting
blinds built into the sides as well as other lanes and structures,” then why
not elsewhere on Turtle Island?
Doesn't the Law of
Parsimony apply not only to the time required for the building of “stone walls”
but also to the reuse of already existing stone structures – or their removal
from the landscape?
Did wooden rail fences
actually come first or were fence laws created to culturally appropriate
existing stone wall fuel breaks and/or petroforms in a quick and simple manner,
adding rails to meet a height requirement?
Will the time come
when an archaeologist's reputation be in jeopardy for NOT recognizing Stone
Features of the Sacred Ceremonial Landscape (such as Turtle Effigies on Turtle Island)?
Will the time come
when the sanity of an independent researcher is NOT questioned when pointing
out repeated patterns in Indigenous Stonework and Artwork…
No farmer was going to take the time to create this snapping turtle, complete with the stone chip for his tongue. http://hilltown2.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2015-09-04T19:40:00-04:00
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure I found exactly what you were trying to show me! I did enjoy so many of your photos while I was looking around for it. I would have commented on this one http://hilltown2.blogspot.com/2015/10/not-in-my-backyard.html if I could - "Surrounded by Serpents!
Delete