Showing posts sorted by relevance for query stone wall myth. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query stone wall myth. Sort by date Show all posts

Thursday, August 30, 2012

Indians vs Cowboys and the Stone Wall Myth

The Stone Wall (altho' in California they like to say Rock Walls) Myth Again

      I was tracking down the aerial image of the place my friend Alyssa calls the Red Spirit Site, a high meadow in the Mt. Shasta area, when it suddenly occurred to me that here's a fine example of a common sense approach to understanding the difference between the ancient stone rows and modern fences. On the left of the image above, on the hill, are the Ceremonial Stone Rows seen up close in the post "Red Spirit, Near Mt. Shasta CA" { http://wakinguponturtleisland.blogspot.com/2012/08/red-spirit-near-mt-shasta-ca.html }. On the right are the "fence lines" of a ranch, which I'd guess are probably posts and barbed wire - or perhaps electric fences. Up in the top right hand corner is a possible exception: looks like an interrupted stone row where there maybe wire fencing and posts added alongside of (or possibly even wedged into the stones of) a stone row - the missing pieces now someone's fire place or garden wall, sold off by the rancher or stolen without his permission.
      Consider the human history of this area: Evidence of human occupation of California dates from at the very least 17,000 BCE, with fine-tuned adaptations to local environments. In remote interior regions, like this little area of land near Mt. Shasta, some tribes did not meet non-Natives until the mid-19th century, the time of the California Gold Rush (1848–1855). Barbed wire was invented and marketed about 1875, about 20-30 years or so later.
     A little Common Sense sort of question might be: "Which group had the time alone to build the miles and miles of stone rows and all the rest?"
      Another Common Sense thing to consider is the human tendency to take the easy way out of any situation, especially when it comes to building fences. The usual progression is usually the fast and easy split rail fences, sometimes those zigzag postless fences called snakes fences or worm fences, whose origin is sometimes thought to be an imitation of Native American hunting fences.
      Eric Sloane was kind enough to illustrate many of these fences:
      I lifted some images here and there - and many from here, showing these fences way out west: {  http://www.siskiyous.edu/shasta/map/hp/ } where you'll find an abundance of photos of wooden rail fences...

...some still hanging around today, handy for stapling barbed wire to.
Ron Smith's photos show a wide variety of modern/historic wire fencing that both makes use of the stone rows or else shows that the stone rows were not the best idea for containing livestock, suggesting that another culture was modifying the landscape for different purposes.
You'll see the details better if you open these in a new window with a right click o'the mouse or use the link to see the photos at Ron's site { http://www.relicsoftheancients.com/  }.
For example:

     I don't know exactly what is going on in the first photo, but the second, I think, clearly illustrates a stone fire break that is also a path that is also full of symbolic representations of Native American Cultural Icons, separating sections of an oak grove that were maintained by Ceremonial Renewal burning  when the time was right to do so. The metal posts and barbed wire strands are the easier and less expensive evidence of the Modern Cowboy or Ranch Hand in the current Cultural Landscape.
     I also pretend not to know why no one bothers to read the abundant amount of Ethnographic accounts that exist about the Native American cultures of the area that include first hand accounts of stone building by Native People, from John Muir to Alfred Kroeber and to the many people presently interested in the truth about these "stone walls" - other than the fact that it may be related to property rights and the theft of land from Native American People, coming right back to Indians vs Cowboys... 


( If you are wondering, "What's the stone wall myth?" I would suggest you click here:
http://wakinguponturtleisland.blogspot.com/search?q=stone+wall+myth )

Monday, July 27, 2026

THE STRANGE CASE of the STONE WALL Made of STONE LACE

 "What the Hell!!" Walls

Dr. John Possum chuckled, turned toward his longtime associate Sherlock Stones seated in his armchair beside him, and said, “Here’s this one popping up again on my laptop screen. “The Dreaded Bladed Lace Wall,” Possum announced as he turned the device so that Sherlock could see.


   “Ah! Those so-called “Lace Walls,” replied Stones. “Named for a stacking technique in Ireland allegedly inspired by a needlework cultural tradition known as “Irish Lace.” The technique led to speculation about Celtic monks settling around the NEW England area, but both also resemble some lacy looking yak fences in the Himalayas but so far no one has speculated about ancient Tibetan monks traveling the seven seas to bring this sort of artistically and culturally stacked stonework to either Ireland or America – or both!”

   “I’d forgotten that he also calls them “What the Hell Walls!” Possum replied in minor amusement and began to read:

    “INTERPRETATION: Colloquially, this is known as a lace wall, though it’s a very unusual one because this shape stacks so easily to minimize pore space..."

 (Under his breath, Sherlock Stones muttered, "A geologic metaphor, an analogy of sorts, the term relates to the porous space between the mineral grains of deep rock formations.") 

   "...Most lace walls are made of rounded ball-shaped stones which require high porosity and stones not bearing weight are very unstable.  Now, having described it with a nomenclature and classified with with (sic) a taxonomy, we can  speculate on why.  This wall makes no sense as a “linear landfill” for field clearing. It might have been a fence, but seem (sic: but it seems?) too low.  It could have been a border to a field or farm.  So, let’s call it an unexplained anomaly, perhaps an idiosyncratic, “what the hell,” folk art expression of some sort, likely built from locally quarried stone on bedrock.  A reconnaissance of the terrain would  provide other clues. But for now, let’s just call it a “Bladed Lace Wall,” writes Professor Thorson.”

   Sherlock Stones  shook his head and said, “Despite being aware that humans were living in North America since at least 20,000 years ago, when the Laurentide Ice Sheet was beginning to recede from New England?” Sherlock Stones replied, “He writes somewhere that, and I quote, “Some aspects of the stone domain (piles, rings, notable stones, short sections of stacked stone) were part of indigenous material culture as dolmens and cairns. The trick is to differentiate these "needles" in a haystack from the "hay" of the nearly ubiquitous Euro-settlement overprint.”

  “Dolmens and cairns?” exclaimed Dr. Possum. “Right back to Ireland, eh Stones??”

   “One immediately begins to suspect the credibility of anyone claiming that ‘dolmens’ were part of the material culture of any Indigenous Peoples anywhere, or at any time, in the entire western hemisphere. One wonders which stone structures the professor of geology is talking about – or which consulting anthropologist suggested such a thing to him,” Sherlock Stones pondered. “You have a people here in this little corner of the continent, repeating these  statements of the Puritans and other early settler colonists about wandering nomadic Indians who were too lazy or too “savage,”  - “too unintelligent to actually place one stone on top of the other,” as some have insisted, in print and in public lecture - despite all evidence of similar stone structures on Turtle Island and in the rest of the world, for that matter.”

   “The Colonial Myth again,” said Possum. “Here’s another post with a link to a Stone Wall Manual. Here he writes, “New England walls built by European settlers range begin with the year 1607 from the Popham colony in south-coastal Maine…”

    “Actually, the only mention of any “stone wall” building in 1607 is that a well was “walled up” – lined with stones. Part of why a “stone fence” has become known as a “stone wall. A drawing of the plantation and fort exists, showing massive walls of stone but on paper and on the ground the fortifications were basket like, dirt and stone filled more easily built gabions,” Stones interrupted. "It's "Tabla Rasa" all over again, sweeping the Indian off the slate to create a colonialistic history, these days turning more and more toward a Nationalistic mythology." 

     The doctor continued reading, “In later coastal settlements the earliest stone features date to the year of arrival in the first half of the 17th century because primitive wharves and piers and sea walls were essential.  The famous erratic known as Plymouth rock, dating to 1620, is a notable stone, in this case an erratic that was moved and imprisoned below the modern wharf.  Features on rural New England properties inland from the sea are typically younger than Metacom's war of 1675-1676 and are restricted to major settlement pathways like the Connecticut River Valley.  The Concord River Valley, MA, dating to 1635, is a notable exception.”

 


Sherlock: The sites of the very first European settler colonist villages were on the sites of Indigenous Villages and the first agricultural fields had been worked by "Indians" for longer  and occupied more permanently than is commonly understood before the greatest depopulation of a people, throughout the NEW England region and beyond." 

   “It speaks to a very misunderstood picture of the cultural landscape of Indigenous Peoples, particularly here along this side, the Connecticut side, of the  Long Island Sound, described by some very early European voyagers, often called Explorers or Discoverers, as a thickly populated place. Verrazano and Smith, as well as others, describe fields and meadows, gardens and forests, village nestled into village, “cheek to jaw,” on the landscape. Missing is a picture of a subsistence method that has no good name, is minimally understood, or something like that I believe Kathleen Bragdon writes somewhere, yet written in the evidence of “stone walls” that in some instances create fuel breaks for managing small parcels of land by thermal pruning, if one can get past the colonialistic myth that surrounds the subject of these Yankee stone walls,” Sherlock Stones said. “Double rows surrounding the roads called pathways as even more “fire insurance,” one could say – roads that also served in part as game drives in certain locations…”

  “Fish Weirs in the water, retaining rows of stones forming causeways over and along the water features,” interjected Possum. “The professor gives a nod to “short sections of stacked stones,” perhaps meaning a Serpent or Big Snake Effigy but perhaps not, but any “longer than short” rows of culturally stacked or laid stones just has to be attributable to the “superior culture” of early European settler colonists – for no good reason other than that’s the myth, the Pristine Myth, the Exceptional Yankee Myth, the folklore that has almost never been scientifically investigated standing in its place.”

   “A Colonialist Archaeology, as Dr. Trigger called it years ago,” said Sherlock Stones. “Turning not merely Nationalistic, but frighteningly Ultra-Nationalistic if one looks at what is currently going on within the United Staes of America these days.” Sherlock sighed and fell silent for a moment. “Many well-meaning researchers who focus on Indigenous Stonework have difficulty “decolonizing” when it comes to these so-called “Stone Walls.” Some will casually dismiss miles and miles of “zigzag stone walls” or rectangular enclosures with right angles as colonial or later “farmer walls,” while yet another will claim to see many variations of an Indigenous stacking method that intentionally includes creation of effigies, the inclusion of Indigenous Iconography if you will.”

    “I recall that old trail along that brook, right on the edge of the city,” said Possum. “We walked up one side on an elevated trail, a causeway, above the good sized stream that contained Indigenous Iconography seen in other stone structures. We soon found ourselves looking the very different stonework related to a railroad across the stony canyon  from the Old Path, used to bring the first dressed grindstone into the area.”

https://wakinguponturtleisland.blogspot.com/2018/05/well-defined-trails-to-mattatuck.html

   “Quite dramatic to those interested in such things,” Stones replied. “Just as the “What the Hell Wall” might be to the serious student of the long history of Turtle Island.”

   Sherlock Stones plucked a printout from the middle of a stack of papers.

   “Here you go, Doctor Possum, one for your blog:”



More Sherlock Stones:

 

My own personal note about major settlement pathways and stone features etc.

Colonial -   New England walls built by settlers range begin with the year 1607 from the Popham colony in south-coastal Maine.  In later coastal settlements the earliest stone features date to the year of arrival in the first half of the 17th century because primitive wharves and piers and sea walls were essential.  The famous erratic known as Plymouth rock, dating to 1620, is a notable stone, in this case an erratic that was moved and imprisoned below the modern wharf.  Features on rural New England properties inland from the sea are typically younger than Metacom's war of 1675-1676 and are restricted to major settlement pathways like the Connecticut River Valley.  The Concord River Valley, MA, dating to 1635, is a notable exception.”

Not At My House:   

   I’ll repeat Thorson’s sentence: “Features on rural New England properties inland from the sea are typically younger than Metacom's war of 1675-1676.”

   And I’ll repeat the sentence I often use: “Not at my house.”

   I live in a house of undocumented age (unless you count the earliest of Treaties negotiated by John Minor) built on a foundation composed of “snakes and turtles,” the “Indian Road” that is sometimes called the Old Connecticut Path, by the site of an Indian village, the Nonnewaug Wigwams, most often described as a “camp” in most local histories, a road that followed migration patterns of mega-fauna and facilitated trade, that eventually connected to other villages and other (sometimes rectangular) “resource zones,” such as “wetland gardens” where food and medicine grew or Forest Gardens of Chestnut and Oak, rectangular fields of blueberries separated but also connected by low zigzag rows of stones, so that three fields continue to produce for every one that is burned over on a four year schedule. It’s not “burning down forests to clear land,” but more like a way most easily maintain small “garden enclosures” – with a stone fuel break so you don’t burn up your neighbors’ enclosures accidently. The spiritual protection of a Great Serpent or Big Snake adds to the power of these “Stone Prayers,” as I understand it.   

  One more place where an abundance of “Indian Stonework” has been disappearing for centuries.

  Nonnewaug in Pootatuck, as some still call it, where I woke up on Turtle Island…

Dawn Spear's painting "As it as Before" and a Chaplain Drawing:


Adding rows of culturally stacked stones:


Friday, May 13, 2022

The Zigzag "Stone Wall" Dissenter (Nonnewaug CT)


    Here in Nonnewaug, it is my observation that many culturally stacked or laid zigzag rows of stones "snaking across the landscape" falsify Eric Sloane’s statement that:

   “One of the minor mysteries of old fences is the zigzag stone fence. Why would anyone place stones in such a fashion? The answer is simple: the stones were thrown there during a clearing, piled against an existing snake-rail fence. The rails rotted and disappeared, but the stones remained, winding across the land in the same crazy manner.”






      Here in Nonnewaug, field checking includes observations of triangular flat topped rattlesnake head-like boulders, similar to those of linear snake effigies, occurring at certain points of the zigzag rows of stones. 

Here in Nonnewaug many zigzag row of stones turn to linear rows, in some cases still retaining a boulder or stacked stone snake head.




     Here in Nonnewaug, the statement and the image used by the Gages in “How to Identify and Distinguish Native American Ceremonial Stone Structures from Historic Farm Structures”  that “If you find a zigzag wall that has even in/outs then you have a farm wall” are also falsified by observations of a large number of consistently  “even” ten foot/three meter long segments of stones creating these zigzags. The 1934 aerial photograph that includes the site of the Nonnewaug Wigwams  is a striking image of these often carefully constructed “even” zigzag stone constructions. It’s possible that some of these zigzags have wooden fence rails placed on top of them in the 1934 photograph, making some of them very visible. Field checking also reveals evidence of a number of decomposing chestnut rails on top of these zigzag rows of stones.
          If a zigzag stone fence is composed of random stones plucked from a plowed field that have been tossed against wooden rails, then would this indeed have the more “regular” and “even” appearance as opposed to stones intentionally “serpent stacked,” recalling these powerful and protective Spirit Beings?



  Here in Nonnewaug, I interpret the majority of these zigzag stone constructions to be Indigenous Great Snakes rather than the later “messy” field clearing debris of the post-contact period. I would suggest that the addition of wooden rails was to meet legal property ownership requirements under colonial law, “improvements” to otherwise “vacant land.”


  And yes, of course, here at Nonnewaug, a few other statements are drawn into question:

Gages “Farm Wall Criteria”

‘A sketch map or aerial photo shows an organized layout of fields.’

(Implies Indigenous Peoples were “unorganized,” implies enclosures were unrelated to Indigenous Landscape usage rather than later cultural appropriations.)

{Early on morning in November 2025, I re-wrote the previous sentence as I responded to someone using the term: "gridded farm walls:'  

What are “gridded farm walls?” Makes me think of the Gages’ “Farm Wall Criteria” that says: ‘A sketch map or aerial photo shows an organized layout of fields.’

This implies that Indigenous Peoples were “unorganized” and that any enclosures that appear are more or less rectangular were unrelated to Indigenous Landscape usage rather are related to later settler cultural creations rather than appropriations and reuse of thousands of miles of existing Qusukqaniyutôkansh or stone fence-like structures created over thousands of years. The colonialistic “Yankee Stone Wall” myth contends that the stones were accumulations of “garbage heaps of field clearing stones” that collected under wooden rail fences, which were later stacked into more “formal” sorts of fences by a “superior culture/civilization” for a brief period of time.} 




   ‘There are openings in the wall to allow access to the fields.’

Early Wooden "Snake Fences" from Eric Sloane:

Why two different kinds of fences??





   (Serpent Gateways at openings, guardian spirits of whatever was inside the enclosure – sometimes wide, sometimes narrow. Sometimes a “step/stone turtle shell” in an otherwise continuous fuelbreak.


 May have a stone wall lined "road" leading to the fields called a cow lane or cow path.

(Remnants of zigzag and linear rows of stones, exhibiting Indigenous Iconography,  still line both sides of many roads, including Nonnewaug Road, evidenced as well in the aerial photography of 1934 before many of the roads were paved and widened.)




May have a wall with multiple notched stones evenly spaced out (about 6 ft apart).

(Many may be Horns possibly placed behind/above snakeheads in the uppermost course of stones, “serpent stacked” smaller effigies that are part of a larger Horned Serpent or Great Snake effigy. These stones may also be horned medicine people or spirit effigies, some of which may also be "about to sing." )


Curtiss Hoffman

I strongly disagree with my friend Curtiss Hoffman when he writes (in part, in "Stone Prayers," page 61): "As Allport and Thorson have shown, New England colonial farmers built thousands of miles of stone walls to separate fields, either to control movements of livestock, or as property boundaries. However these walls are generally made of well-laid stones and are higher than one course of stones, and they also run straight in one direction, and meet at right angles, and tend to be continuous for considerable distances, wherever they are not dilapidated or punctured for cart paths. What I am calling "stone rows" lack some or all of these features: they tend to be made of smaller stones which are more haphazardly laid; they may be only one or two courses high, so they would not be able to function to keep animals in or out...they meet other walls at non-right angles..."

   (Allport and Thorson (et al) are repeating a colonial myth related to “Yankee Exceptionalism” that completely ignores the idea that Indigenous Peoples of the Northeast built with stone. Many “walls” featuring Indigenous Iconography, both zigzag and linear, are “well laid” and “higher than one course of stone,” and in my experience do extend for “great distances” and do meet at “right angles.”

“Haphazardly” is hardly the term for some of the more massive and exceptionally well built stacked stone constructions that have managed to survive unmaintained over hundreds of years of time.  

 






    Before 1990, I might have told you the same old story about the mystery of zigzag stone walls that almost everyone still repeats, derived from the writer and artist Eric Sloane. Since 1990, when I began “ground checking” what should be “Yankee Farmer built stone walls,” I became more inclined to suspect that the oldest of the stonework was made by Indigenous Peoples over an undetermined number of years. And I can’t find one yet, a zigzag stone wall that fits the Eric Sloane conjecture turned fact method of construction, although in a small number of places, the angle segments are filled with what appear to be dumped field stones from later field clearing of plowed enclosures for a short span of distance. I have also come across one example of old chestnut rails placed on top of a series of single stones.

 

    My little Case Study of “Zigzag Stone Walls” mostly comes from around where I live, an English Watch House overlooking the former floodplain fields associated with a late Woodland/Contact Era Pootatuck village known as The Nonnewaug Wigwams, occupied in 1672 when colonists fron Stratford CT arrived, and “abandoned” sometime around 1740. The Indigenous place name probably refers to the stonewall-like diagonal fish weir in the river of the same name. And yes it’s the “Nonewaug” Cluster in “Stone Prayers” by Curtiss Hoffman, a place where I do vaguely give out locations by saying “in plain sight most everywhere one goes.” My experience and observations are that the oldest and most numerous of “stone walls” are probable snake effigies that served in part as fuel breaks and water control on a Sacred Landscape that was in part a garden and in part similar to a great and vast cathedral.

 

An incredibly beautiful example:

https://wakinguponturtleisland.blogspot.com/2017/04/grey-fox-serpent.html

 Way too many more examples:

 https://wakinguponturtleisland.blogspot.com/search?q=zigzag

At Rock Piles over the years: 

https://rockpiles.blogspot.com/search?q=zigzag

Saturday, March 30, 2013

Faces in the Stones


Surfing off of Peter's recent posts {http://rockpiles.blogspot.com/2013/03/powissett-mounds.html & http://rockpiles.blogspot.com/2013/03/on-way-back-from-powissett-mounds.html }, I came across an image in a Google Search that "got me" - this time in a good way.
Above: A photo from:

{From a Flickr Set called: 2008.11 Noanet Woodlands (part of Hale Reservation) that belongs to Wade Roush (the photos, not the woodland) that I found here:http://www.flickr.com/photos/wroush/sets/72157608567946328/with/2992639069/}

Mr. Roush starts his photo set with some fine photos of Historic Stonework that sort of recalls stacking stones almost as you would bricks or blocks…

…but then he (and his very good looking dog) walk out along a Rock Wall that is built in a very different manner, something described here and there as an "abandoned wall" or a "primitive wall," depending on what you are reading about New England Stone Fences and who wrote (or plagiarised it):
I think this wall has that “Indian Look,” that placement of stones, that artistic stacking of stones, that recalls the shapes of animals, often just the heads but sometimes the complete animal. What I find most often is the form of the Turtle, perhaps the most easily made sort of Petroform, which may not be all that surprising on a continent that was, and still is, called Turtle Island. I see them as Cultural Icons of the Native Americans who were shaping the landscape (as all cultures do) since at least 3000 B.C. (and probably a lot longer than that), according to the Reservation’s Website {http://www.halereservation.org/nr_history_land.html}:

“The land now occupied by the Hale Reservation literally abounds with early Indian and colonial history. The main Reservation Road, Carby Street, was originally known as “Old Indian Path” and on early maps it was part of an Indian trail that led from a large Indian settlement in Dedham to Strawberry Hill near the Westwood-Dover line, and on eventually to South Natick. Early records show that the “Plains of Powissett” (the land surrounding Powissett Peak and certain sections of the Charles River) were favorite hunting and fishing grounds of at least six different tribes of the Powissett Indians, and as late as 1763, a few Indian families could still be found in Dover. At least nine ancient, felsite quarry sites have been identified on Reservation land, which indicates that the ancestors of the Powissett Indians also were frequent travelers or residents of the area. The felsite was fashioned into arrowheads, spears, and other objects. Archaeologists from Harvard’s Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology have determined that these sites were being used by ancient man as early as 3,000 B.C. — the date associated with the building of the Egyptian pyramids…”
And of course the “Stone Wall Myth” is repeated once again:
“During the 1700’s, most of the Reservation’s land was cleared of timber and used extensively as pasture. This accounts for the extensive stonewalls throughout the area. They were used to mark property boundaries as well as to confine livestock.”
If you have ever visited this blog before, you might have noticed that I think that there are more Native American made stone “walls” that have either been taken apart to be used elsewhere, carelessly bulldozed or are explained away by the Myth and I’ll keep writing and rewriting this over and over until I get it right and convince at least one person who might take it seriously to get this fact recognized. (A random sample of this ranting occurs in a search of this blog: http://wakinguponturtleisland.blogspot.com/search?q=The+Stone+Wall+Myth).
And as I say above, Cultural Icons appear in these Indian made stone rows (which are not to be confused with “boulder rows”). And sometimes a human-like face appears in these rows, possibly “spirit faces,” just as they do on stone mounds, just like all the other Icons. The first historic writer claiming to have found these spirit faces called them “Indian God Stones.”

(A photo of Page 173 “Manitou” by Mavor and Dix)
This fine website, Native Stones {http://www.nativestones.com/effigy.htm}, has a handy list of a few of these effigies:
Rev. Ezra Stiles (president of Yale), The Literary Diary of Ezra Stiles:
·         January 29, 1789: At E. Guilford 28th I visited an Indian Stone God which lay in a Fence about half a Mile East of Mr. Todds Meetinghouse . . . . Mr. Phineas Meigs died about 1781, aged c. 73. He told Rev. Jonathan Todd (born 1713) that he removed this stone God from the Bottom of the Hill at the Edge of the Swamp, and put it into the fence. It was removed about twenty Rods. I judge it a Ton & half weight. Mr. Benjamin Teal gave me an account of a Fort or Inclosure by Earthen Walls about 21/2 Miles N.W. from this Image, 30 or 40 Rods long, two Rods wide Trench, Wall ten feet high Inside next a Swamp & five feet next the Hill, being on a Declivity .
·         May 19, 1789: "View[ed] an Indian Stone God [at Springfield, MA], similar to ours in the College Library.
May 22, 1789: "Visited Rev. Mr. Huntington [at Middletown] who went & showed me another Indian stone God about half a Mile East of his Meetinghouse.
·         September 19, 1794: "[On top of West Rock in New Haven] I spied a carved or wrought stone, which I know to be one of the Indian Gods, of which I have found about or above twenty in different places from Boston to Hudsons River, and particularly between New Milford on West and Medfield Massachusetts on East.
·         October 22, 1793: "Aged Deacon Avery of Groton Pockatunnek tells me that the Mohegan Indians once had Idols : that in the great Reforma 1741 as he called it those Indians brot in & gave up to the English a number of stone & wooden Idols ; & have had & worshipped none since.
I’ve wandered into some places in Woodbridge CT that Stiles also explored and possibly found one he might or might not have noticed as well:

Another in Woodbridge, not so blurry, more human face-like: 

Here’s a photo from Rock Piles, taken by my friend Peter, from that post mentioned before:

I thought I saw a rather human like stone on one of those mounds and cropped it here to show you:
Going back to Mr Roush's fine set of photos, I'll repeat this one:
And show you the detail that "got me," perhaps yet another Spirit Face: